• What from the current Framework is staying the same? What do you expect to change? We heard your feedback that the Framework and its embedded Career Clusters and Pathways should reflect industry or occupational groupings. We do expect to consolidate some existing Career Clusters and add new Career Clusters as appropriate and as recommended by industry representatives and aggregate stakeholder feedback, supported by labor market research. This means that Cluster names will also potentially change, though it is possible that some Career Cluster names will remain the same. All potential changes will go through a feedback loop process, involving engagement with a wide range of diverse stakeholders.

• Who is participating in this process? 
  • With guidance from our Boards, we will stand up a National Advisory Committee, chaired by a Board officer and composed of state leaders and national experts from a variety of diverse backgrounds who have significant experience using the Framework. 
  • We will also be leveraging distinct Industry Advisory Groups to provide expert feedback about and champion changes to their respective Career Cluster. There will be an open application as part of the selection process. 
  • This process will also be supported by a contractor who will conduct significant portions of the stakeholder engagement and provide initial recommendations to modernize the Framework. This contractor will be selected through a national RFP process starting in January.

• What is your timeline for this project? While we cannot commit to specific intermediate milestones at this time, the new Framework and all appropriate associated assets will be finalized by the end of 2024. We recognize the time this process will take and appreciate your patience as we work through this initiative together. The field will be given ample time to voluntary begin implementation of the Framework following its release. 

• Is there a guiding principle for this project? Our north star through this process is a renewed purpose statement, unanimously approved by Advance CTE’s Boards of Directors in September 2020: The National Career Clusters Framework provides structural alignment and a common language to bridge education and work, empowering each learner to explore, decide on and prepare for dynamic and evolving careers. Further, the Framework will align to the goals of CTE Without Limits. 

• I shared feedback already about my Cluster during a prior iteration of this project. How has that feedback been incorporated into this phase of the initiative? Earlier in 2022, we paused this project as a resullt of significant feedback from the field about potential changes to the Career Clusters. As a result of this feedback, we are approaching the new phase of this refresh in an even more transparent and stakeholder-driven process, notably by engaging a National Advisory Committee and Industry Advisory Groups. Themes from the feedback received earlier in this process will be considered and inform our work going forward. While we endeavor to ensure this phase is as responsive to feedback as possible, our commitment to a Framework that equitably support learners across all Career Clusters and serves as a bridge between education and work remains steadfast. We will be using the current Framework as our starting point for the work, not the previous draft model that was proposed earlier this year. 

• How can I get involved? Right now, the best way to get involved is to stay informed of the updates along the way. To do that, sign up for our Career Clusters updates HERE. In the future, there may be opportunities to complete surveys or share individual feedback; we will share that information through the emailed Career Clusters updates and on this webpage.

• What if I still have questions? If you still have questions, please email careerclusters@careertech.org and someone will respond to your questions as soon as possible.

• Angel Malone, Superintendent, Limestone Charter Association; former State CTE Director, South Carolina
• Bridgette Gray, Chief Customer Officer, Opportunity@Work
• Brittney Baptiste Williams, State Director of Career, Technical and Adult Education, Louisiana Community and Technical College System; Advance CTE Board Member
• Cathie Raymond, Deputy Associate Superintendent and State CTE Director, Arizona Department of Education; Advance CTE Board Member
• Dr. Chaney Mosley, Assistant Professor of Agricultural Education, Middle Tennessee State University; President-Elect, Association for Career and Technical Education
• Darlene Miller, Executive Director, National Council for Workforce Education
• Dr. Deanne Unruh, Co-Director, National Technical Assistance Center on Transition: the Collaborative
• Doug Major, Superintendent/CEO, Meridian Technology Center, Stillwater, Oklahoma; former President, ACTE
• Elizabeth Bennett, Associate Commissioner of College, Career and Technical Education, Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education; Advance CTE Board Member
• Heather Justice, Director, Career Readiness, Education Strategy Group; former State CTE Director, Texas, Tennessee
• Justin Chin, Director of High School Connections, Lane Community College, Eugene, Oregon; ECMC Postsecondary CTE Fellow
• Katahdin Javner, Postsecondary CTE Learner, Eastern Maine Community College; national officer, SkillsUSA
• Dr. Katie Graham, State CTE Director, Nebraska Department of Education; National Advisory Committee Chairperson and Advance CTE Board of Directors Vice President
• Lul Tesfai, Director of Program Development, The James Irvine Foundation
• Dr. Michelle Aldrich, State CTE Director, Wyoming Department of Education; Advance CTE Board Member
• Nicholas Moore, Education Policy Advisor and Director, Alabama Governor’s Office of Education and Workforce Transformation
• Dr. Pradeep Kotamraju, Deputy Director, Research, Policy and Legislation, California Workforce Development Board; former State CTE Director in Minnesota, Iowa and California
• Dr. Rachel Rosen, Co-Director, Center for Effective Career and Technical Education, MDRC
• Sandy Spavone, Executive Director, FCCLA, on behalf of NCC-CTSOs
• Susan Mayer, Chief Learning Officer, Achieving the Dream
• Tiara Booker-Dwyer, Senior Policy Associate, Policy Studies Associates and Region 4 Comprehensive Center; former State CTE Director, Maryland
• Tony Warren, Education Consultant, Calhoun Intermediate School District; ECMC Postsecondary CTE Fellow
• Trey Michael, Director of Career and Technical Education, North Carolina Department of Education; Advance CTE Board Member

What are Industry Advisory Groups? What is their breakdown? 

The Industry Advisory Groups (IAGs) are groups of sector-specific employer representatives, diverse in company profile, geography and race/ethnicity, who can speak directly to the recruitment and training needs, challenges and future direction of their field. The IAGs will help inform and validate potential changes to the Framework, provide key insights into additional stakeholder engagement and champion the future direction of the Framework. A listing of the participants and a compilation of Frequently Asked Questions, including selection and methodology, is below.

Industry Advisory Group Member Listing 

What is the purpose of the Industry Advisory Groups? The overall purposes of the IAGs are twofold: 1)To provide a dedicated space for industry partnership and input to ensure the National Career Clusters Framework meets workforce needs and 2) To better understand evolving and emerging career opportunities and skill priorities for learners at all levels of education. These groups will then help inform and validate changes to eventual Career Clusters.

Does the composition of these groups reflect the future design of the Career Clusters? No - while the groups will inform the eventual changes to the National Career Clusters Framework, the IAGs were designed to be more representative of industry sectors. The final Career Clusters will be different from the IAGs.

Who is an ideal candidate for these groups? The ideal candidate is an individual  who has a long standing history in a given sector, can speak broadly to both national and regional workforce needs, and thoroughly understands the hiring and training opportunities and challenges of that sector. For that reason, public institutions, private businesses, associations, unions, training organizations, and other groups are viable participants. We do ask that vendors of products related to the National Career Clusters Framework identify themselves during the nominations for this group.

Who is selecting the participants? Will everyone nominated be selected? Our national partners Indigo Education and WestEd will select the eventual participants for the IAGs. Because of capacity, approximately 20-30 participants for each IAG will be recruited; groups will be curated to ensure geographic, size, sector, gender and racial diversity. Selected participants will be notified in June 2023. Nomination does not guarantee selection. 

How were the IAG groupings determined? We used a mixed-method methodology to determine these groups, based on the current National Career Clusters Framework and the NAICS and SOC systems which, combined, represent the entire world of work. The IAG framework reflects the interdisciplinary character of 21st century sectors and occupations; cross-sector occupations will be identified during IAG meetings. For example, Management, Leadership & Entrepreneurship, as its own IAG, represents the robust nature of the field, however small business owners will be represented in all IAG groups. Engineering is combined with manufacturing, as engineering aligns with production and, in a broader sense, the production of infrastructure. The STEM cluster will be represented by multiple corresponding IAGs.